Legal Opinion
Brinckerhoff v. JAC Holding Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 16, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered September 19, 2002, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, granted the cross motion of defendant Larry D. Clay for summary judgment dismissing the derivative claim for misappropriation of corporate opportunity as against him, and granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ direct claim for discriminatory shareholder treatment, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of denying defendant Clay’s cross motion and reinstating the dismissed derivative claim against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Crescent/Mach I Partners, L.P. v. TurnerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
- Strassburger v. EarleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
- Ault v. SoutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Brinckerhoff v. JAC Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Stillwater Capital Partners Inc. LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Davis v. Scottish Re Group Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Semi-Tech Litigation, L.L.C. v. TingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Hribar v. Marsh & McLennan CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Davis v. Scottish Re Group Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.