Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federal Betterment Co. v. Reeves

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1906No. 14,482Published

Error from Neosho district court; Leander Still-well, judge.

1DissentPorter, J.

(dissenting) : I dissent from the statement of law in the second paragraph of the syllabus. I think an attending physician is competent to testify, unless the matter is privileged, to his conclusions with reference to .the character and extent of a patient’s complaint or injury, and to base his opinion upon his examination and treatment in connection with the “history of the case” obtained from the patient. If the patient relates to him the manner in which he was injured, and even the details of the accident, it is not to be presumed that the physician permits such statements to affect his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Block v. Milwaukee Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Quaife v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Stewart v. EvertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Barber v. MerriamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API