Legal Opinion

State v. Magone

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1897PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From Multnomah: Thos. A. Stephens, Judge. Daniel Magone was convicted of grave robbery-in exhuming and stealing the body of W. S. Ladd. Being without means he was defended by counsel appointed by the court to serve without compensation.

1Per curiam

The defendant, Daniel Magone, was jointly indicted with Charles Montgomery, William Rector and Edward Long for the crime of disinterring a human body, and, being separately tried, was convicted thereof, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of two years, from which judgment he appeals.

It is contended by counsel for defendant that the' court erred in the admission of the testimony of certain witnesses who detailed the declarations made by Montgomery, Rector and Long to them in the absence of defendant, after the commission of the alleged crime: while counsel for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Nightingale v. ScannellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Sheppard v. YocumOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Osmun v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. HooverOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. FarberOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. Yee GuckOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pacific Livestock Co. v. GentryOregon Supreme Court · 1900

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API