State v. Farber
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Defendant appeals his jury conviction for murder. He contends that the trial court erred in admitting statements made by his alleged coconspirator. The claim of error involves questions of the nature of the hearsay testimony, the sufficiency of the evidence establishing the alleged conspiracy and defendant’s federal constitutional right of confrontation. The Court of Appeals initially reversed defendant’s conviction, but on reconsideration, affirmed the conviction and remanded for resentencing. State v. Farber, 59 Or App 725, 652 P2d 372 (1982). We also affirm his conviction.
The state’s basic…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. NielsenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CornellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.