Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Kelly
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1953No. 5817PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA PRADE, Justice.
On July 18, 1953, this court ordered a peremptory writ of mandamus to issue in this proceeding which was determinative of the issues involving the constitutionality of the financial administration act of 1953. Due to the exigencies of the situation then existing no written opinion was delivered. Now having had time to prepare a written decision we hereby state the reasons for the issuance of the peremptory writ and the holding that the act was unconstitutional in its entirety.
On July 11, 1953, C. A. Hudson, doing business as Hudson Tire Company, invoked the original…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- State ex rel. Kennedy v. BrunstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Warner v. People ex rel. ConnerNew York Supreme Court · 1845
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Yelle v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- State Board of Technical Registration v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Giss v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Mattson v. KiedrowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.