Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. Levy

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 26, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The case relied on by the court below involved the right to serve a reply and was not applicable to the present-case where a reply was directed by order of the court. Motions to strike out allegations or parts of pleadings on the ground that they are redundant or unnecessary are not favored and are granted only where the allegations are prejudicial and have no bearing on the subject-matter of the litigation. (Baruch v. Young, 149 App. Div. 466; Stern v. Philipsborn, 169 id. 781.) In view of the direction for a reply the provisions of section 243 of the Civil Practice Act did not aid…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clode v. SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Baruch v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. SpitzkaNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sitowsky v. SitowskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API