Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Spitzka

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGarvin, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff for an order striking out certain denials contained in defendant’s answer as sham and frivolous, and certain defenses on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that they are insufficient in law. As will appear, the question involved, so far as those defenses are concerned, is the application of the Statute of Limitations.

There is a further question of pleading which must be decided and which will be hereinafter discussed.

It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff and her husband, Henry Sanchez, now deceased, were married on January 12, 1907; that on or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Purdy v. McGarityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  2. Randolph v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Youngs v. . KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Jones v. . LudlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Erie, Railroad v. International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. E. F. Curialle & Co. v. Kenray Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API