Legal Opinion

Vincent v. Santa Cruz

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1982No. 13022PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondents, William and Roberta Santa Cruz, entered into a contract with appellants, Verla and Randall Vincent, to purchase one and one-quarter acres of real property. Originally, the property in question comprised two and one-half acres. However, respondents and another buyer each purchased one-half of the original parcel, with the understanding that each parcel would be suitable for building.

The parties’ purchase agreement set forth the terms of the sale and in bold print stated: “WHEN PROPERLY COMPLETED THIS IS A BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD, SEEK COMPETENT COUNSEL.”…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Golberg v. SanglierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Forrest Currell Lumber Company v. ThomasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Martinez v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kleeman v. ZigtemaNevada Supreme Court · 1979

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Webb Ex Rel. Webb v. Clark County SchoolNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Interstate Commercial Building Services, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1998
  3. Loomis v. Lange Financial Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mandel v. Household Bank (Nevada)California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Arbor Grove Properties v. Clear Sky Realty, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API