Legal Opinion

Pfau v. Reynolds

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1870PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Adams county; the Hon. Joseph Sibley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence

This was an action brought by Reynolds against Pfau, to recover damages for injuries received in consequence of falling into an excavation made by Pfau in a sidewalk in the city of Quincy. Pfau was preparing to build a house, and in digging his cellar, extended it, without procuring the authority of the city, across the sidewalk. To prevent persons from falling into the the excavation, he built a fence across the sidewalk on each side of the hole, but left the front, along the gutter, unguarded, except by an embankment of earth about eighteen inches high, along the top, or by the side of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. McDowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Carroll v. Centralia Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Pettit v. Incorporated Town of Grand JunctionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. First Springfield Bank and Trust v. GalmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. McEniry v. Tri-City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API