Legal Opinion

Piccolo v. Giant Mills, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 22, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

21 N.J. Super. 383 (1952)

91 A.2d 265

VINCENT PICCOLO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

GIANT MILLS, INC., AND INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 15, 1952.

Decided September 22, 1952.

Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Duffy & Ruggiero, attorneys).

Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys; Mr. Hyman W. Rosenthal, of counsel and on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, S.J.A.D.

In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bacak v. HogyaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Hoffman v. Trenton TimesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  4. Eggert v. Mutual Grocery Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tryba v. FrayNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Tryba v. FrayNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wimsatt v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API