Legal Opinion

In re FOJP Service Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael J. Dontzin, J.

This motion concerns itself with a problem, frequently confronting courts: whether to maintain the secrecy or to order the disclosure of Grand Jury minutes in the public’s interest. The fundamental substantive issue involved is whether a party seeking disclosure has demonstrated a compelling and particularized need for disclosure that is persuasive enough to overcome the strong presumption in favor of secrecy.

Charles E. Smith (Smith) joined by George Schlossman (Schlossman), Irving Mandell (Mandell), Mark Kressner (Kressner), all lawyers (movants)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. In re District AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. Di NapoliNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Fritz v. Huntington HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Matter of QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Melendez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. James v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. In re NYP Holdings, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2003
  4. James v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. LaumeyerNew York County Court, Yates County · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API