Legal Opinion

McClosky v. Regal Mining, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1997No. Nos. 95-2635 and 96-304PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals in case No. 95-2635 is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Afrates v. Lorain (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 22, 584 N.E.2d 1175.

The complaint in mandamus in case No. 96-304 is dismissed because relator has an adequate legal remedy from the Industrial Commission’s order by way of appeal to the court of common pleas. R.C. 4123.512; Afrates v. Lorain.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bond v. Velotta Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Bond v. Velotta Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Long v. Quarto Mining Co., Unpublished Decision (1-28-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. McClosky v. Regal Mining, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997