Legal Opinion

Dart v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 20, 1933No. Docket Nos. 56704, 56705PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*128OPINION.

Teammell:

The petitioners do not question the correctness of the action of the respondent in including in taxable income the amount of interest credited to their’short accounts, but contend that the amounts of the charges made against their accounts as the equivalent of dividends paid on stock which they had sold short should be allowed as ordinary and necessary expenses and for the purpose of determining the profit from the short sales should not be added to the cost of stock when purchased to complete such short sales. The respondent contends that a short sale of stock is not a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Provost v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Terbell v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  3. Adirondack Sec. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  4. Burman v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  5. Schwinn v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Main Line Distributors, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  2. Dooley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  3. 1955 Production Exposition, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  4. Briarcliff Inv. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  5. 1955 Production Exposition, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API