Hurley v. Conklin
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DOWNEY, Judge.
Appellants, Faye Y. Hurley and Raymond S. Hurley, seek review of a final judgment which found them ultimately liable for damages for breach of implied warranty arising out of the sale of subdivision lots that had been improved with a seawall. Carriage Hill Limited Partnership filed a “cross-appeal,” which in reality is a joinder in appeal, seeking review of the same final judgment which found Carriage Hill immediately liable for breach of implied warranty.
The record reflects that appellee Carriage Hill Limited Partnership was the developer of a subdivision in Boca Raton,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Gable v. SilverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Yepsen v. BurgessOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Rutledge v. DodenhoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Drexel Properties, Inc. v. BAY COLONY, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Conklin v. HurleySupreme Court of Florida · 1983