Legal Opinion
Petro-Chem Processing, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Hazardous Waste Treatment Council v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 13, 1989No. 87-1487, 87-1548 and 88-1177PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RUTH BADER GINSBURG.
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners Hazardous Waste Treatment Council (HWTC) and Petro-Chem Processing, Inc., in Nos. 87-1847 and 87-1548, challenge an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) time-extension decision; the challenged decision enlarged by more than three years the deadline for “big city” cement kilns to apply for “interim status,” which would allow them to burn liquid hazardous waste without a permit. Petitioners also challenge a decision of the Agency that would allow St. Mary’s Peerless Cement…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Nova Health Systems v. FogartyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Gustav Buchholz v. Meyer Njus Tanick, PACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Grocery Manufacturers Ass'n v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Parvati Corp. v. City of Oak Forest, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Samuel Frank, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.