Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 14, 1924No. 3421PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Tbe information upon which plaintiff in error was convicted was supported by an an insufficient verification, and a reversal is now sought on account thereof. No objection was made to the information during the trial. It is asserted, however, that upon the motion in arrest of judgment this infirmity was pointed out, and, though such act does not appear of record, we accept this statement.

The decision in Farinelli v. United States (C. C. A.) 297 F. 198, covers the question so fully that we feel further discussion of it is unnecessary. The verification may he and is waived by the accused going…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1923
  2. Abbott Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
  3. Farinelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Poleskey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API