Legal Opinion
Anthony W. Bost v. Federal Express Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 8, 2004No. 03-13408PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
The main issue in this appeal is whether an EEOC intake questionnaire and affidavit satisfy the requirements of an EEOC charge when these documents state that they are for “pre-charge filing counseling,” the EEOC does not treat them as a charge, and the employee later files a timely charge. We conclude, in this circumstance, that the intake questionnaire and affidavit do not constitute an EEOC charge because these forms would not have suggested to a reasonable person that the employee who completed them had yet manifested an intent to activate the administrative process.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Robert J. McCarthy v. John Manson, Commissioner of Corrections of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Damon v. Fleming Supermarkets of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Hipp v. Liberty National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Foudy v. Indian River County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Montes v. Vail Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Abram-Adams v. Citigroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Myra Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Jones v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.