Legal Opinion

In re Dorrell R.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 24, 2001No. AC 20926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The respondent mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights with regard to her son, D.1 On appeal, she claims that the court improperly (1) found that the department of children and families (department) had made reasonable reunification efforts at the time that the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner), filed the petition to terminate the respondent’s parental rights, (2) found that termination of her paren*457tal rights was in the best interest of D and (3) used a “sympathy” standard in deciding whether…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Altfeter v. Borough of NaugatuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. In re Shaquanna M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. In re Shane P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. In re Amanda A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. In re Tyscheicka H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Davonta V.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Wallenta v. MoscowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. In re Kachainy C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. In re Vincent B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. State v. DuboseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API