Legal Opinion

Blanks v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 2, 2016No. 1050/15PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EYLER, DEBORAH S., J.

This case raises the question whether the Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), applies in a probation revocation hearing. We hold that it does not. We further hold that the right to confront witnesses as protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does apply and was satisfied in this case.

On November 14, 2011, in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County, Richard Blanks, the appellant, entered an Alford plea to a charge of robbery.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EsquilinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. State v. FearsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API