Miller v. Maass
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that his parole release date had been extended under ORS 144.125(3) and that he was denied constitutionally required treatment for the severe emotional condition that the Board of Parole identified as the basis for extending his term. See Ohlinger v. Watson, 652 F2d 775 (9th Cir 1980). He requested immediate release from incarceration or an order that defendant provide him a comprehensive treatment program. The trial court addressed the merits of the request but denied petitioner relief and dismissed the petition for the writ. He appealed,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Keenan v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shelby v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Jones v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Bahrenfus v. BachikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Sager v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Cook v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.