Legal Opinion

Blair v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 15, 1988No. 444-87CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Senior Judge:

Plaintiff, a former employee of the Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army (Corps), seeks to recover overtime compensation under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (1982) and the Prevailing Rates Systems (PRS), 5 U.S.C. § 5341 et seq. (1982), covering the period September 1982 to September 17,1986. Plaintiffs position is that since he worked, during the above period, from ten to thirteen hours per day for eight consecutive days, which were followed by six consecutive days off duty, he is entitled, under the FLSA, to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Pure Gold, Inc. v. Syntex (u.s.a.), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goolsby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  2. Hart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Hendrix v. City of Yazoo CityDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1989
  4. Marrs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API