Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. United Railroads of S.F.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1915No. S.F. No. 6195PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William M. Abbott, William M. Cannon, and Kingsley Cannon, for Appellant. Sullivan & Sullivan and Theo. J. Roche, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiffs are the children and heirs at law of Margaret McLaughlin, a widow, whose death was occasioned by the admitted negligent act of defendant. Two of the children, Maud and Ralph, had attained their majority. Juanita, at the time of her mother’s death, was a minor, aged seventeen years. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of seven thousand five hundred dollars. From the judgment which followed and from the order of the court denying defendant’s motion for a new trial this appeal is prosecuted. Upon the appeal the principal question urged and argued is the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Althorf v. . WolfeNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MeigsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. Harding v. Town of TownsendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  5. Lipscomb v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Brown v. BoehmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Westfall v. Caterpillar, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cherrigan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API