Legal Opinion
In Re the Reinstatement of Whitworth
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 20, 2011No. SCBD 5667PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, Justice:
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
T1 On March 11, 2008, 1 this Court suspended Petitioner John Matthew Whitworth (Whitworth or Petitioner) from the practice of law for two years following disciplinary proceedings brought by the Oklahoma Bar Association (the Bar) pursuant to Rule 6, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 0.8. 2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A. 2 The suspension began to run on June 26, 2006, the effective date of Petitioner's previous suspension for noncompliance with mandatory continuing legal education ("CLE") requirements. We found nothing in the record in our review of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Amendment to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings Rule 7, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App.1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- In Re the Reinstatement of MunsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- In Re the Reinstatement of MuminaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- In Re the Reinstatement of OtisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF MCLAUGHLINSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. IngramWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF MCLAUGHLINSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018