Whitbeck v. Estate of Ramsay
Appellate Court of Illinois
Claim in Probate.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clinton County; the Hon. George W. Wall, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Sample
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The court below refused to allow the claim of appellants on the ground that they signed the official bond of Ramsay as sureties because certain banks, in which the sureties were interested, were to have the use of the public money in consideration of the payment by said banks to Ramsay of two and one-half per cent interest on monthly balances. The appellants deny that there was any unlawful or corrupt agreement between them, as sureties, and Ramsay, and assert if there was an unlawful agreement between Ramsa)7 and the banks in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chapman v. Forsyth & LimerickSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Orem v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Philpot v. GruningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Hunter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. CushingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Tcherepnin v. FranzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- Bradley v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- City of Santa Fe v. First Nat. Bank in RatonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Interstate Bankers Casualty Co. v. HernandezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.