Legal Opinion

Oahu Ry. & Land Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided September 26, 1947No. Civil Action 773PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin, Judge.

The plaintiff by this action, predicated upon the Federal Tort Claims Act, Sec. 931 (a) of 28 U.S.C.A., seeks to enforce an asserted right of contribution against the United States under the Territorial Joint Tortfeasors’ Act, Revised Laws of Hawaii 1945, Sec. 10487 et seq. by an appropriate motion the Government urges the dismissal of the action.

Briefly the facts are that:

1. On October 9, 1943, an Army tank while being operated upon a public highway in the City and County of Honolulu collided with a bus operated by the plaintiff as a licensed public carrier.

2. As a result…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. SchrieferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. The Western MaidSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Ex parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schott v. Colonial Baking Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  2. Uarte v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  3. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. In Re Silver Bridge Disaster LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1974
  5. Brown & Root, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API