Commonwealth v. McCurdy

OPINION BY BOWES, J.:

¶ 1 On appeal, John McCurdy questions the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions of corrupt organizations and conspiracy to commit corrupt organizations, claiming that there was no proof that his criminal actions benefited an enterprise with which he was connected. Appellant posits that the evidence indicated that he was a lone operator in his drug selling activities. We affirm.

¶2 Appellant was arrested by agents from the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General (“Attorney General”) pursuant to a statewide grand jury investigation and was charged with…