Succession of Slaughter
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Twenty-seventh Judicial District, Parish of Ascension — Leche, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Provosty, J.
The opponent, J. H. Gardner, was holder of three notes of the de cujus. One for $500, dated May 28th, 1884, due forty-five days after date, with eight per cent, interest from date. Another *493for $200, dated May 1st, 1885, due sixty days after date, -with eight per cent, interest from date. And another for $75, dated May 31st, 1889, due sixty days after date, with eight per cent, interest from date. All to the order of the opponent.
No payment had been made on these notes, and they were long prescribed when, on the 28th of July, 1900, the de…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Williams v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by20 opinions
- Beatty v. ViningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Burdin v. BurdinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Henry Block Co. v. PapaniaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Succession of AurianneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Weil v. Jacobs' EstateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.