Legal Opinion
State v. Conzo
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 8, 2008No. A08A0319PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Chief Judge.
Contending that the trial court erred by dismissing an indictment for violating the statute of limitation because an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy occurred less than five years before the indictment, the State appeals from the trial court’s order of dismissal. We disagree, and therefore affirm.
The State alleges that the defendants 1 violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), OCGA § 16-14-4 (c), and unlawfully conspired with each other to violate OCGA § 16-14-4 (a). It asserts that the defendants devised a telemarketing scheme to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- United States v. Marlon Watford, A/K/A Tony Vallie and Ronnie RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- State v. BairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Duke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Lynch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.