Legal Opinion

State v. Bair

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 26, 2010No. A09A1959PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

Contending the charges against Verna Bair were not time barred, the State appeals the trial court’s order granting her plea in bar based upon the running of the statute of limitation. The State contends the statute of limitation did not expire because Bair was re-indicted within six months of the date on which the first indictment was quashed. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court.

When an appellate court reviews a trial court’s decision on a plea in bar, we conduct a de novo review of the legal issues. State v. Conzo, 293 Ga. App. 72, 73 (666 SE2d 404) (2008). Further, we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. TuzmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Wooten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Womack v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  4. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. State v. ConzoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lynch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. Royal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. State v. ArmendarizCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Pennington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Roesser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API