Legal Opinion

Doll v. Purple Shoppe

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, Harriet E. Doll, Adolph Doll, J. Frank Doll, and John H. Ryder, are co-partners doing business under the name of Norm Company and are engaged in the preparation of advertising matter consisting of a series of advertisements for use by merchants and others in advertising their businesses through newspapers and other media and in the sale of such use to merchants for stated periods. Their place of business is in New York. The defendant, Purple Shoppe, Inc., is a corporation engaged, at Jefferson City, Missouri, as a merchant in the sale of ladies' ready-to-wear goods.

On October…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keithley v. Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Morrison v. YanceyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Rhodes v. Holladay-Klotz Land & Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Kick v. DoersteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Camp v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Red-E-Gas Company v. MeadowsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Johnson v. Estate of GirvinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Norman v. McLellandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Carrier Corp. v. Royale Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Francis v. SaleebyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API