Kidd v. Texas Public Utility Commission
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Bob Pemberton, Justice
This appeal’ can be considered a sequel of sorts to this Court’s recent Bonser-*390Lain decision,2 in which we held in part that the remedies provided by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)3 for challenging agency actions in court do not extend to authorizing suits to challenge an agency’s refusal to promulgate rules.4 Here we consider whether, in an instance when, an agency has denied a petition requesting it to promulgate rules—a decision that cannot in itself be judicially challenged under the APA, per Bonser-Lain— the APA has nonetheless conferred jurisdiction…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. HeinrichTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Andrew Sansom Heinz Stefan Roesch Bee Spring, Ltd. Hays County And City of Kyle v. Texas Railroad Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
- Texas Telephone Association and Texas Statewide Telephone Cooperative, Inc., and Their Participating Members Windstream Services, LLC Texas Windstream, LLC (d/B/A Windstream Communications) Windstream Communications Kerrville, LLC (d/B/A Windstream Communications) Valor Telecommunications of Texas, LLC (d/B/A Windstream Communications Southwest) Windstream Sugar Land LLC v. Public Utility Commission of Texas Peter Lake, Chairman Will McAdams, Commissioner Lori Cobos, Commissioner And Jimmy Glotfelty, Commissioner, Each in His or Her Official Capacity at the Public Utility Commission of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022