Legal Opinion

In re Rainbolt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1918No. 9380PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Petition for WHt of Habeas Corpus. •

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus by Lucy Rainbolt, who claims to be unlawfully restrained of her liberty by defendant herein. It appears that Mrs. Rainbolt was adjudged insane by the County *582Court of the City and County of Denver, in July, 1916, and committed to the care and custody of her husband until further order of the court. The writ is sought under section 2919, R. S. 1908, which is as follows:

“Second, where, though the original imprisonment was lawful, yet by some act, omission or event, which has subsequently taken place, the party has become entitled to his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wiesmann v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Wood v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hultquist v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Arridy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  3. Overholser v. TreiblyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  4. Isham v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Coulter v. CoulterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API