Nellis v. Johnson
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Coleman, J.:
Respondent has moved the court to remand the bill of exceptions to the trial court for amendment and correction.
It is the contention of respondent, supported by affidavit, that the testimony of three certain witnesses, as set forth in the bill of exceptions, is contrary to the testimony of each of said witnesses given upon the trial; that the testimony of two other witnesses as set forth in the bill of exceptions is incomplete and does not set forth the true facts as testified to by the witnesses.
In support of the motion, counsel for the respondent has filed an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sutherland v. RoundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peccole v. Luce & Goodfellow, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1949
- Union Indemnity Co. v. A. D. Drumm, Jr., Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1936
- Eldorado-Rand Mining Co. v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Fallon v. Churchill County Bank Mortgage Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935