Union Indemnity Co. v. A. D. Drumm, Jr., Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The theory that an equitable lien exists in favor of job creditors finds no support either in the law of this state or the contract itself. Section 5338 N.C.L. Job creditors, like any other creditors, must look to the surety if the contractor defaults in his obligations. It is highly significant that in the original public highway law of 1937 there was no proviso requiring payment of retent to contractors without regard to job creditors. That proviso was added…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Belknap Hardware & Mfg. Co. v. Ohio River Contract Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Escalle v. MarkNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- In re CramondDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commercial Credit Corporation v. MatthewsNevada Supreme Court · 1961
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Peterson-McCaslin Lumber Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1956
- Werner v. MormonNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Ferrara v. FirschingNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- Gonzales v. Shotgun Creek Las Vegas, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.