Marriage of Kerr v. Kerr

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Appellant Jonathan R. Kerr challenges the district court’s distribution of nonmari-tal homestead interest and retirement-account funds to respondent Danielle M. Kerr. Because the district court did not err in finding that neither respondent’s payment of closing costs and taxes when the parties purchased their homestead nor the parties’ refinancing or establishment of a home-equity line of credit decreased respondent’s nonmarital homestead interest, we affirm in part. But, because the district court failed to make adequate findings regarding its award of…