Legal Opinion

State v. McPherson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 27, 1988No. 1 CA-CR 12345PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

The defendant, Malcolm McPherson, was charged with armed residential burglary, theft, and criminal damage. The trial court, Judge Mangum, dismissed the charges pursuant to Rule 11.6(e), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. The state has appealed, raising the following arguments:

1. The trial court erroneously found that McPherson was permanently incompetent and that the charges against him were comparatively minor, and, therefore, erroneously dismissed the charges under Rule 11.6(e).

2. McPherson waived his right to be tried while competent by choosing to withdraw…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LouraineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Quigley v. City Court of the City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. State v. MaryottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. State v. BeffordArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. HayesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Patricia Adams v. Hon. Brenden Griffin City Prosecutor's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API