Legal Opinion
Hamm v. Nasatka Barriers Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 21, 1996No. Civil A. No. 94-0747 (PLF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This is a negligence action brought by Sharma Hamm, a former Court Security Officer at the United States Courthouse in the District of Columbia, against Nasatka and Sons, Inc., Nasatka Barriers, Inc., and the United States of America for injuries she allegedly suffered from a malfunctioning courthouse security barrier owned by the United States and installed and maintained by Nasatka. The claims against Nasatka will *2be tried to a jury; the claims against the government will be resolved by the Court. The government takes the position…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Lisellotte Moyer, Etc. v. Martin Marietta Corp., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Birnbaum v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Schetter v. Housing Authority of the City of ErieDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sohyon Warner v. Gilbarco, Inc., Gilbarco, Inc. (d/b/a Gilbarco Veeder-Root) and Vontier CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Touko v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023