Legal Opinion
First National Bank v. Goodman
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.
On motion by the plaintiff in a foreclosure action to confirm the report of sale and for a deficiency judgment, pursuant to section 1083-a of the Civil Practice Act, the court appointed a referee to take testimony and report on the fair and reasonable market value of the mortgaged premises. The plaintiff's motion was ordered held in abeyance pending the report of the referee.
It appears that the premises were purchased in 1929 by Celia Goodman and Philip Goodman, deceased, husband and wife, as tenants by the entirety, for $11,000, and the mortgage in question, given January 7, 1930, in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heiman v. BishopNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- In re the Estate of DellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Claim of Dusenbery v. BraggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Wicks v. CarmichaelNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Ballin v. Apperson Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Broidy v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1950
- City of New York v. Nic Homes, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1964
- Pringle v. Edenwald Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1940