Legal Opinion
Claim of Dusenbery v. Bragg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 27, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
From the pleadings in this proceeding it appears that there is no dispute as to the facts.
The testatrix, Harriet A. Rogers, gave a mortgage upon a parcel of real estate in 1910. In 1917 she made a will making Ella P. Bragg and Florence H. Jackson her executrices, as well as legatees. Each of the executrices received over $4,000 as legatee upon the distribution of the estate. The will was probated in 1919. The will is not printed in the record and we do not know to whom the mortgaged real estate was bequeathed, nor what, if any, power *554was given the executrices over its disposition. But it does…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glacius v. . FogelNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- In Re the Accounting of GillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. Wechsler EstateNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Colgan v. DunneNew York Supreme Court · 1888
- Mayor of New York v. GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of BaldwinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of BrennerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- First National Bank v. GoodmanNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of CroninNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.