Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Maricopa County

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided November 9, 2006No. CV-04-2873-PHX-DGCPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Defendants have filed motions for summary judgment on all claims and the parties have filed several motions to strike. Dkt. ## 204, 210, 221, 269, 272. Plaintiffs also have filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order dismissing Defendant Maricopa County Sheriffs Office. Dkt. # 212. The Court heard oral argument on October 27, 2006. Dkt. #295. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motions for summary judgment in part, deny them in part, and deny the motions to strike and the motion for reconsideration.

I. Background.

Phillip Wilson…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Braillard v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Williams v. Alhambra School District No. 68District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  3. Cotta v. County of KingsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  4. Giron v. City of AlexanderDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010
  5. United States v. Maricopa CountyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API