Bernardo v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) (1) and (6), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C., for lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. It moves in the alternative for summary judgment under Rule 56(b).
Plaintiff sues for personal injuries suffered while he was employed by defendant allegedly “in the performance of work traditionally performed by seamen” and while “engaged in repairing a structure, which structure was one employed in aid of navigation, and at which time the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Swanson v. Marra Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mutation Mink Breeders Ass'n v. Lou Nierenberg Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Rudolph E. Hill v. B.F. Diamond, Trading as Diamond Construction Company, John Gence Hodges v. B. F. Diamond, Trading as Diamond Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Kollsman Instrument Corp. v. Astek Instrument Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Bernardo v. Bethlehem Steel CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. YoungbloodDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.