State v. Franklin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ray Thornton, Justice.
The State appeals from the circuit court’s decision to grant the motion of appellee Kevin Franklin for a new trial due to ineffective assistance of his counsel, Kenneth Haynes. The State argues that the defense did not present evidence of prejudice relating to Mr. Haynes’s alleged errors in representing Mr. Franklin and that the circuit court erroneously relied on cumulative error in making its determination. Mr. Franklin responds that evidence of prejudice was presented, and the circuit court properly granted the new trial based on six separate instances of attorney…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Noel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Buckley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Walden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.