Legal Opinion

Jaymar-Ruby, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 17, 1981No. 80-2369PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KUNZIG, Judge.

The issue here is one of first impression before this court: whether the FTC’s decision under the Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1980 to disclose its investigative files to state attorneys general is judicially reviewable. We hold that such decisions are not reviewable, provided that the two statutory prerequisites of (1) confidentiality and (2) official law enforcement purpose are satisfied. We rest principally on the “committed to agency discretion” exception of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(2) (1976). 1

Before relating the facts of this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Schilling v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jim Mattox, Attorney General for the State of Texas v. Federal Trade Commission, and Chevron Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Edward J. Fleming, III v. Federal Trade Commission Milton Bradley Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. Cambridge Hosp. Ass'n, Inc. v. BowenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  4. University of Chicago Hospitals & Clinics v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Lieberman v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API