Legal Opinion
Cenlin Taiwan Ltd. v. Centon, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 13, 1993No. 92-35003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
5 F.3d 354
21 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 1091
CENLIN TAIWAN LTD., a Taiwan Corporation; Ajico Products
Taiwan Corp., a Taiwan Corporation; Sprightly
Trading Co. Ltd, a Taiwan Corporation,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CENTON, LTD., a Washington Corporation, Defendant,
and
The Bank of California, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-35003.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 1993.
Decided Sept. 2, 1993.
As Amended Oct. 13, 1993.
Burton V. McCullough and James D. Hepworth, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Delbert D. Miller, Roger A. Leishman and Kathleen Brame Lemly, Bogle &…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. William R. Ponsoldt, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- The Emery-Waterhouse Company v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank, the Emery-Waterhouse Company v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Youngblood v. SchiremanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- G.F.D. Enterprises, Inc. v. NyeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barber v. Hawai'iCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Tokyo Kogyo Boeki Shokai, a Japanese Corporation v. United States National Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997