Legal Opinion

United States v. Kernell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 30, 2012No. 10-6450PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant David Kernell was convicted of obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1519 for deleting information from his computer that related to his effort to gain access to the email account of then-Alaska governor and Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin. Section 1519, passed as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, prohibits the knowing destruction or alteration of any record “with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation ... of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States ... or in relation to or…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Holder v. Humanitarian Law ProjectSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Robert McKay v. William FederspielCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. MoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Lorne SemrauCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Ravneet SinghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. USA v., Alexander McQueenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API