Legal Opinion

Holland v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1972No. Appeal, No. 210 C.D. 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

This is an appeal from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying benefits to Doris L. Holland (claimant) under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of 1936, as amended, 43 P.S. §802 (e), which provides: “An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week— * * * (e) In which his unemployment is due to his discharge or temporary suspension from work for willful misconduct connected with his work, * * Both the Bureau of Employment Security and the referee had rendered similar decisions.

The Findings of Fact of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Devlin Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Coke Division, Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Gensheimer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Jones v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Aluminum Co. of America v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Catanzaro v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API