Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Aberdeen Automobile & Supply Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1915No. File No. 3793PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court of Brown- County. Hon. Geo. W. Crane, Judge. Action by G. N. Williamson, against the Aberdeen Automobile and Supply Company, upon a promissory note and an account for goods sold. From a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. Appellant cited: .Dewey v. Komar, (21 S. D. 117) no N. W. 90; Sioux Remedy Co-, v. Cope, 59 U. S. D. Ed., 57.

1Opinion of the CourtMeCOY, P. J.

There was a v-erdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff alleged two separate causes of action; (x) Upon a promissory note for $671.80, executed and -delivered by defendant to the Federal Rubber Manufacturing Company, and indorsed and -delivered to plaintiff by said payee; (2) upon an account for $236.30 for goods, wares, and merchandise sol-d and delivered to defendant by the Federal Rubber Manufacturing Company, and’ which account by written assignment was -transferred to- plaintiff.

Defendant made answer, alleging that plaintiff is not the owner of said note and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizens' Bank v. CorkingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Dewey v. KomarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Coffin v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunellen Bd. of Ed. v. Dunellen Ed. Assn.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Toker v. PerlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. State, in Interest of JmNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API