Kurtenbach v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[T1] Appellant, Matthew Christopher Kurtenbach (Kurtenbach), entered a conditional plea of guilty to the crime of making a false statement to obtain credit, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3-612(a) (LexisNexis 2007). 1 The condition was that Kurtenbach be authorized to appeal the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss the information based upon a claim that his right to a speedy trial was violated.
ISSUE
[¶2] The only issue raised by Kurtenbach is that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss based on lack of a speedy trial. The State contends that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Joreski v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Kurtenbach v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Ronald Wayne Crebs III v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Matthew C. Kurtenbach v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Anthony M. Fuentes v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.