Legal Opinion

Kurtenbach v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2008No. S-07-0289PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[T1] Appellant, Matthew Christopher Kurtenbach (Kurtenbach), entered a conditional plea of guilty to the crime of making a false statement to obtain credit, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3-612(a) (LexisNexis 2007). 1 The condition was that Kurtenbach be authorized to appeal the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss the information based upon a claim that his right to a speedy trial was violated.

ISSUE

[¶2] The only issue raised by Kurtenbach is that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss based on lack of a speedy trial. The State contends that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Joreski v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kurtenbach v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Ronald Wayne Crebs III v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Matthew C. Kurtenbach v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Anthony M. Fuentes v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API