Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Zalis v. Blumenthal

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 25, 1969No. [No. 304, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.

The appellant Zalis, who seemingly never has been licensed as a real estate broker and was last licensed as a real estate salesman for the 1963 license year (May 1, 1963 to April 30, 1964), sued the appellees, licensed real estate brokers trading as Riggs Realty, for that they did agree to pay him:

“a finder’s fee [of $15,000] under written contract dated July 23,1965 [which read “It is hereby agreed that Walter M. Blumenthal, T/A Riggs Realty will pay a finder’s fee of $15,000 Herbert Zalis upon settlement and disbursement of the commission received by him for the sale of the Dyke and Ina Mae…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keener v. HarrodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  2. Thorpe v. CarteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Corson v. KeaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Schwartze v. YearlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  5. Smirlock v. Potomac Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. StricklandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Caddell v. SingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  3. Higgins v. ScherrDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1987
  4. Certa v. WittmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Caddell v. SingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API