Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richards v. Argonaut Insurance Companies

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 1986No. 82-11053; CA A34477Published

1DissentWarden, J.

Because I would affirm the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, I respectfully dissent.

As the majority correctly points out, for claimant to prevail on his aggravation claim, he must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his 1979 injury was a material contributing cause of the worsening of his knee’s condition in 1982. ORS 656.273(1); Grable v. Weyerhaeuser, 291 Or 387, 631 P2d 768 (1981). He has not done so.

Both Dr. Mandiberg and Dr. Wells had to rely on histories given by claimant. Mandiberg had performed surgery on claimant’s right knee after his 1979 compensable injury *436and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of GrableOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bloomfield v. National Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API